AIA authoring and scoring
We complete the official AIA questionnaire with the engineering team, score the system honestly, and produce the public-facing AIA artefact in the form Treasury Board expects.
Canada's Directive on Automated Decision-Making requires an Algorithmic Impact Assessment for any federal automated decision system. CFRI authors and reviews AIAs, designs the technical mitigations they require, and integrates AIA evidence directly into the production system rather than treating it as a paperwork exercise.
We complete the official AIA questionnaire with the engineering team, score the system honestly, and produce the public-facing AIA artefact in the form Treasury Board expects.
We design and implement the mitigations the AIA requires — peer review of training data, bias evaluation harnesses, override mechanisms, recourse pathways, and monitoring — not just describe them.
We instrument the system so the AIA's claims remain true after launch: drift monitoring, decision logging, recourse audit trails, and re-assessment triggers.
Any federal department deploying an automated decision system must complete an AIA under the Directive on Automated Decision-Making. The level of mitigation required scales with the AIA score.
Yes. We re-assess deployed systems against the current AIA version and design the gap-closure plan.
Yes — Ontario and Quebec equivalents on request, plus AMF-aligned governance for Quebec financial-sector deployments.
Both. We prefer to author the AIA and ship the system together so the documentation matches reality.
The R&D portions (novel evaluation harnesses, bias mitigation research) are typically SR&ED-eligible. The compliance authoring portion is not.
Email info@cfri.io with the system name and current AIA score (if any).
Thirty minutes with operators who have already shipped what you're trying to figure out. CAD-billed. SR&ED-aware.